Peer Review Process

  1. The Education and Entrepreneurship Management journal is committed to adhering to international publishing standards, employing equitable peer review processes, and providing open access. In this regard, this journal has opted for the practice of Double Blind Peer Review, where neither the author is aware of the reviewer's identity nor the reviewer knows the name or affiliation of the author. This approach ensures the review process is conducted solely based on scholarly criteria, free from bias or prejudgment. Three reviewers will review each manuscript, and these reviewers will have one month to provide feedback.  After receiving comments from at least two reviewers, the editor-in-chief will decide on the manuscript's status.
  2. Before submitting their manuscripts via the journal's submission system, it is imperative for authors to thoroughly review the author guidelines, precisely structure their manuscript based on those guidelines, and then proceed with submission.
  3. Upon submission, the editor-in-chief examines the manuscript to ensure compliance with all the principles outlined in the author's guidelines. Manuscripts that fall outside the scope and objectives of the journal or significantly deviate from its writing style will be excluded from the review process. However, manuscripts aligning with the journal's objectives but needing structural adjustments will be reviewed by the editors or the editor-in-chief, who will communicate areas for improvement to the author. This phase typically spans seven to ten days. After revisions, if the editor-in-chief acknowledges that the modifications have been made, or if the author takes the revisions seriously and is expected to refine their writing style further during the review process, the manuscript will proceed through the review process.
  4. The process of accepting manuscripts conforms to the diagram below: